Knowledge Review

These are 11 real conflicts where two respected sources genuinely disagree about the same scenario. We analyzed 290 candidate pairs and filtered to only the ones where a coach can't follow both rules.

For each pair, you see Rule A vs Rule B side-by-side. Four options:

• Pick a Winner — click the rule you agree with, the other gets rejected
• Keep Both — actually, these aren't conflicting after all
• Discard Both — neither is good enough

Auto-advances to the next pair after each decision.

There are 4 biomechanical dimensions that AI can't fill — they need your hands-on expertise:

• Cervical Spine Demand — How much does this exercise load or position the neck?
• Rib Cage Interaction — Does it involve expansion, compression, rotation, or anti-rotation?
• Muscle Dominance Bias — Quad-dominant, hip-dominant, push, pull, rotational, or balanced?
• Fascial Line Involvement — Which primary fascial line is loaded?

One exercise at a time, ~55 total. Click the chip that best fits each dimension, hit Save. Skip anything you're unsure about.

When two rules conflict, the system needs to know whose opinion wins. This table ranks the 14 content sources we extracted from.

• Tier 1 — Gold standard. Wins all conflicts. (Cressey In-Service, SSS, Reinold FST)
• Tier 2 — High quality, slightly less depth. (Driveline Edu, Cressey Blog)
• Tier 3 — Solid but less specific. (Driveline Blog, RPP, Tread, YouTube Cressey)
• Tier 4 — Supplementary. Should never override higher tiers. (VeloU, YouTube shorts)

We've pre-filled these with AI-proposed tiers. Adjust any that feel wrong, then hit Save All.

This shows your overall progress — how many rules you've reviewed, which domains are done, and your recent activity. Check it when you want to see where you stand.

Target: clear all 300 rules + 30 contradictions + 55 exercises over ~2 weeks. That's roughly 15-20 minutes, 5-6 sessions.